2012 Chevrolet Cruze

Change

2012 Chevrolet Cruze

Starting MSRP $16,800–$23,190

Average Rating

4.4 out of 5
Review This Car
Comfort:4.1 out of 5
Performance:4.3 out of 5
Exterior Styling:4.6 out of 5
Interior Design:4.5 out of 5
Value for the Money:4.2 out of 5
Reliability:4.4 out of 5

46 out of 55 people would recommended this car to a friend

Consumer Reviews

Page 1 of 6 Next Page

Greg's 2012 Cruze

by Greg
from Jackson, Wyoming | January 21, 2013

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 5 out of 5
Performance: 5 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 5 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"This car has consistantly done more than expected in terms of MPG, comfort & convieniences, performance in snow & ice over Teton Pass and overall appeal. I love being in this car (when I do have to commute/travel). The folks at Teton Motors were very helpful and made no assumptions that put pressure on my decision making proces.."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Commuting


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

1 out of 1 found this review helpful

Better then my 2012 CIVIC!

by Swingle
from Valparaiso In | January 15, 2013

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 5 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 4 out of 5
Value for the Money: 4 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"Overall rating of my 2012 Cruze 1LT is VERY GOOD. For Comfort, the front seats are a bit hard at first, but soften after the first 1000 miles or so. Noise level inside is nonexistant! It is as quiet at 20mph as it is at 80mph. Performance is good for what it is. i have the 6 speed manual. i am able to downshift to get more power from the 138hp. engine. It is not quick, but very efficient!! Cornering is better then expected. Smooth comfortable ride. Drove the 6 speed automatic, Transmission seemed quirky. GO FOR THE MANUAL PEOPLE!! Don't be so LAZY! Exterior styling is good. Interior Design is very good except for the awkward placement of the front cupholders. Pleanty of storage otherwise. Value for the money? everyone wants to pay less. I purchased a new 2012 model at the end of the year with a manual transmission that was deeply discounted. twenty thousand six hundred msrp. I paid sixteen thousand six hundred or four thousand off sticker. not bad. Reliability is yet to be seen. under 2000 miles so far. Not to bash a car, my 2012 Civic was in the shop 4 times in the first 1200 miles. It is better then my 2012 CIVIC!! Yes i sold my HONDA CIVIC. I could not wait to get rid of it!!"

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Commuting


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

1 out of 1 found this review helpful

Best Car For The Money

by hockeyhauler
from St. Paul, MN | December 29, 2012

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 5 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"Great overall car. I have the ECO model with the 6 speed MT. Average gas mileage is between 36-39 mpg. Had two fill ups at 43+ due to all highway miles at 55 mph. Car is very spacious for its class, I'm 6'2" 210 lbs and I find the driver's seat to be comfortable yet properly bolstered. Controls are easy to reach and well planned out. Steering is crisp yet not touchy. Brakes are somewhat squishy at times. Exterior styling is simple yet refined with the new Chevy grill as a focal point. Trunk space is beyond what you'd expect, easily fits two hockey bags with room to spare. Pros: Great MPG, spacious for class, well made interior, turbo gives a great boost/acceleration, does well in MN winters. Cons: Brakes are soft, no spare (only an inflator), ECO model pushes $20K."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Work


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

1 out of 1 found this review helpful

don't buy this car

by blondie
from belton, mo | December 29, 2012

Rating from

(1)
Comfort: 3 out of 5
Performance: 1 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 2 out of 5
Reliability: 1 out of 5

"Dont buy a 2012 chevy cruze. I bought one I have had numerous problems with transmision and the dealership Cable dahmer of kansas city won't fix it. its stalls out, it shifts in high rpm, it bucks. several times it has gone high rpm and won't go over 40 mph. its not a realiable car. It does not have cruse control."

I would recommend this car to a friend: No

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Transporting family


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

0 out of 2 found this review helpful

product ok

by chevy non cruze
from Bellaire, Michigan | December 27, 2012

Rating from

(4)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 4 out of 5
Value for the Money: 4 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"Gas milage is very good. Surprised to not have cruise control. Kind of assumed that cruise control was a standard feature in this day and age. Car is good value for cost."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Just getting around


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

0 out of 0 found this review helpful

small car comfort

by mrsmooth
from wilmington,de | December 17, 2012

Rating from

(4)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 4 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

".chev has put all their tricks into this one..very Quiet ride all the options you could want..l love it..too early for reliability comments"

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Just getting around


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

0 out of 0 found this review helpful

had 6k miles...been good, we'll see as miles accum

by none
from cincinnati, ohio | December 4, 2012

Rating from

(4)
Comfort: 3 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 3 out of 5
Value for the Money: 3 out of 5
Reliability: 4 out of 5

"have th LT model with instrument package wish it had compartment for glasses and larger center compartment, gas mileage combined city/hwy 34mpg, only has 10k miles per year, a lease contract"

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Commuting


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

0 out of 1 found this review helpful

Chevrolet Cruze

by Quinn10
from Honolulu,HI | November 12, 2012

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 5 out of 5
Performance: 5 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 5 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 5 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"Bought this car band-new.Now has 9K miles. Not a single mechanical issue; the car is still tight with no rattles or squeaks. The overall fuel economy has improved to over 38 MPG for 80% city driving. My best 50 mile economy is 50.0 MPG. Got an indicated 45+ MPG for a recent 450 mile trip which is probably around 42 MPG actual. The computer is consistently 2-3 MPG high. My only complaint is the hood has a few chips in it; I've read other complaints about this as well . Overall, I'm very pleased with this car. I highly recommend anyone shopping for a high MPG car test drive a Cruze before making a purchase decision."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Just getting around


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

0 out of 1 found this review helpful

Unexpected Small Car Excellence from GM

by Enthusiast
from Michigan | November 10, 2012

Rating from

(5)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 5 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 5 out of 5
Value for the Money: 5 out of 5
Reliability: 5 out of 5

"This is my first compact GM car in 25 years due to their cheap interiors, mediocre styling and poor driving dynamics. My Cruze Eco manual has exceeded every expectation: the car is fun to drive, quiet, refined and regularly exceeds 45 MPG on my work commute. The firm European engineered front seats are very supportive, the ride with the sport spring suspension is well controlled and comfortable and the shifter throws are short and light. I have 11K miles without a single issue. The trunk is bigger than some mid-size cars and the interior room rivals a mid-size. The Pioneer sound system is worth the money, the fog lights work better than any factory lamps I've had on my cars, the nav screen is large, colorful with crisp readouts, the back up warning works well and the power seat, combined with the tilt/telescopic wheel, offers a wide rang of adjustability. If you want more power contact Trifecta (0-60 in 6.8 seconds - auto). GM engineers sweated the details to create a car that has exceeded the EPA ratings 100% of the time. My overall average is around 37 MPG actual, not indicated. The lighter weight and lowered CG contribute to a nimble feeling car. A friend who drives a BMW asked to trade cars after he drove my Cruze. I have to shift it more than my Corvette but that's part of the car's nature; the shifter is enjoyable to use so that's not a problem for me. This car looks good, handles well (tire limited, not chassis - Tire Rack has LRR tires that add 0.04 g's), is easy to see out of, has a solid structure (the doors sound like a Mercedes when they close) and has ten airbags. The car could use 40 HP and 50 ft. lbs. (if Trifecta can do it so can GM), four wheel disc brakes (using the Volts HD brake system would provide much improved stopping), and an armrest with cupholders for the rear passengers (Eco autos get one, not manuals). Those are my only complaints. I looked at other vehicles in the segment but was impressed by the Cruze's overall performance and value. If you're in the market for a refined, fun to drive, high MPG car I recommend test driving the Cruze Eco manual before making a purchase decision."

I would recommend this car to a friend: Yes

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Commuting


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

1 out of 1 found this review helpful

Nice car except for the Antifreeze smell.

by miler
from Wisconsin | October 28, 2012

Rating from

(4)
Comfort: 4 out of 5
Performance: 4 out of 5
Exterior Styling: 4 out of 5
Interior Design: 4 out of 5
Value for the Money: 4 out of 5
Reliability: 1 out of 5

"I've had this car for a little over a year, and have enjoyed driving it. Nice features, easy to drive, even liked the gas mileage. But, 2 weeks ago I started to smell antifreeze in the cabin. Sure enough, my radiator fluid was low. Took it into the dealership, and GM said to put "dye in the radiator, and have the customer drive it around for a week". Yep, breath in more burnt antifreeze, but, just for another week.... Even though this problem is well known, GM has not shown a fix for it. And, I don't think they will. Bought it for $23,000. Trading it in for a Honda. Trade in value is only $13000. But, fresh air is priceless."

I would recommend this car to a friend: No

This vehicle was purchased: New

Primary use for this car: Just getting around


Did you find this review helpful?

Yes No

2 out of 4 found this review helpful

Page 1 of 6 Next Page
*Invoice prices are made available by Cars.com and are not dealer advertising. All prices are subject to regional variations. Prices last updated 9/23/10. Click here for more information.

Research Competing Vehicles

Choose up to three models to compare to the 2012 Chevrolet Cruze

2012 Ford Focus

2012 Ford Focus

Starting MSRP
$16,500
2012 Honda Civic

2012 Honda Civic

Starting MSRP
$15,755
2012 Hyundai Elantra

2012 Hyundai Elantra

Starting MSRP
$15,345